Attendant's View
Visitors are reminded not to eat in the galleries. The staff may attack you for your food.

  • Cartoons and Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Links Elsewhere
  • We're sponsoring...

Missing your Museum Mission Objective: Reducing women to a red smudge.

13/8/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
So you may have seen this compelling (in an awful, watching a film so bad you have to watch it all the way to the end, unable to believe it's  this bad, way) piece of news:

Museum billed as celebration of London women opens as Jack the Ripper exhibit

To give the short version, people were a shocked when a museum promising to “...recognise and celebrate the women of the East End who have shaped history, telling the story of how they have been instrumental in changing society.” opened up as the "Jack the Ripper Museum".

Because the chap behind it - Mark Palmer-Edgcumbe - says that as the project developed he decided a more interesting angle was from the perspective of the victims of Jack the Ripper. 

“It is absolutely not celebrating the crimes of Jack the Ripper but looking at why and how the women got in that situation in the first place,” he said.
Picture
There has been uproar, peaceful protests, and calls for the council to investigate just how dodgy all the planning application was. And then, it starts to get really interest as the Guardian has been digging deeper... 

Jack the Ripper museum architect says he was 'duped' over change of plans,  taken-down webpage reveals origins stretch back to 2008, charity asks to be removed from any association with the museum.

PictureImage taken from http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/05/jack-the-ripper-museum-salacious-misogynist-rubbish-london-east-end
Below are highlights from the article linked above…

He apparently lied to the architect:

Andrew Waugh, founder and director of Waugh Thistleton Architects, said he would not have touched the project “with a bargepole” if he had known his designs were going to be used to house displays of Ripper artefacts.

“They came to us and said they had no money but that this is a real heartfelt project. It is incredibly important to celebrate women in politics in the East End. We did it at a bargain-basement fee, at cost price because we thought it was a great thing to do. “

He apparently lied about when the Ripper interest developed:
The museum’s founder maintained that as the project developed he decided a more interesting angle was from the perspective of the victims of the Ripper. 

However, the museum’s own website (on a page which was taken down from the museum’s live website) stated that he wanted to explore the story of Jack the Ripper as far back as 2008, when he was involved with an exhibition about the serial killer at another museum. 

He has a long running history of involvement with Ripper businesses:
Palmer-Edgcumbe was co-director of a company called Jack the Ripper Museum (London) Limited in 2012 – long before planning consent was sought for the Whitechapel “museum of women’s history” in August 2014. The company was dissolved in March 2014. 

Palmer-Edgecumbe is currently listed as co-director of a company incorporated in October 2013 in the name of 5S Visual Supplies Limited. This name was changed to Jack the Ripper Museum (London) Limited in May 2014, just two months after the first company was closed. 

He offended a charity which works to combat violence against women: 
 “As a charity with a long history of supporting women survivors of violence we are unhappy with the way in which the museum has used our name without permission.” 

He apparently mislead the council about the project when seeking planning permission:     
“Planning officers in the council will be investigating whether the installed museum sign is contrary to the planning approval conditions. Further enforcement may also be taken in relation to the opening hours listed on their website, which are not in line with the original planning application.” 


There are so many levels of cock-up involved in this debacle, but probably the worst point is the continued insistence that, according to their website: "THE MUSEUM TAKES A LOOK AT THE HISTORY OF WOMEN IN THE EAST END IN THE VICTORIAN ERA AND DISCUSSES WHY SO MANY WOMEN HAD LITTLE CHOICE IN THEIR LIVES OTHER THAN TO TURN TO PROSTITUTION"

This is quite possibly a valid point (having not visited, I can't comment on the inclusion of this subject in the museum) as they can easily make a pass at it as part of the museum. However, it is blatantly not the focus of the museum, and that strap-line is found once you scroll down the front page. Which mainly shows this:
Picture
Palmer-Edgcumbe would probably have been better off nailing his colours to the mast and dropping all pretense of examining women's history. It would have pissed people off, but actually been more honest, and avoided some of the backlash now taking place against the museum's ongoing claims.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Webcomic and occasional blog about the heritage sector.
    Share The Attendant:
    Follow The Attendant:
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Tumblr

    RSS Feed

    Topics

    All
    Archaeology
    Art
    Behind The Scenes
    Blog
    Book
    Cartoon
    Castles And Houses
    Complaints
    Daft Questions
    Don't Do That...
    Don't Do That...
    English Heritage
    Entrance Desk
    Forrin Tourists
    Guided Tours
    Handy Gallery Attendant Tip #
    Happy Stories
    Kids
    Mischief
    Museums
    National Trust
    Old Dears
    Parents
    Parks And Gardens
    Review
    School Visits
    Submitted
    Tourist Information
    Yuk

    Archives

    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010

    Author

    All text and images are produced by and copyright of the artist, holder of the domain name of attendantsview.com
    Please contact for permission to use images, which will probably be gladly given, but it's only polite to ask first!

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.